- DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE INSTALL
- DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE OFFLINE
- DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE WINDOWS
DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE OFFLINE
Use for their offline help? CHM has been deprecated since ages, but thereĭoesn't seem to be any real replacement for it from Microsoft, is there?
DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE WINDOWS
The fact that it can only be generated from a Windows system using anĪncient tool is rather bothersome and I definitely don't like this.īTW, does anybody know what are "modern" Windows applications supposed to Reason I'd like to drop it - it's not that I don't like CHM itself, but R> build the CHM file themselves (which is what I now do).Īs long as we provide CHM files as part of the release, we need to use aĭoxygen version which generates it correctly.
DOXYGEN GENERATE CHM FILE INSTALL
R> me 😁) that still use CHM files that they could simply install 1.9.3 and R> maintains older versions, one could always suggest for the holdouts (like R> The CHM problem with 1.9.4 is more significant - but since Doxygen Then (maybe not immediately though, as I have to work on some other things Great to hear, thanks! I'll try using the custom theme with 1.9.3 a.s.a.p. R> all HTML pages in 1.9.4, but depending on what the theme does, that may be R> fixed for all versions that I tested (through 1.9.4). R> I've updated the issue indicating that the formatting problem has been I'll be trying that once I've looked at a lot more files to check for problems. If it's related to then it may be simply a matter of finding out what's breaking the parser, and changing the files to work around it. Randomly jumping to a few other overviews, I'm not seeing other issues, so I still don't know if this is a problem isolated to two files, or a more general issue. h files in the overviews directory that contain but only two of them exhibit problems. An even worse problem is overview_resyntax.html where the doxygen parser gets confused and generates most of the content in its raw form without line breaks (snippet below)Ĭlass-shorthand escapes (AREs only) provide shorthands for certain commonly-used character classes: ] However, 1.9.3 does still have the problem with paragraphs becoming bold in overview_xrcformat.html (tested on both firefox and chrome). Building with Doxygen 1.9.3 doesn't cause either problem. Anyways, I'll do more investigating and follow up here orĭoxygen 1.9.4 is when the generated CHM index file (index.hhk) changed to pick up all constructors, and also added some script that generates script errors in some of the topics. R> allow it by default - too great a chance for malware to be inserted R> is - a script accessing the internet is exactly why Microsoft doesn't First, though, I want to figure out exactly what the issue R> That means a doxygen-generated script change, since 1.8.17 doesn't have Why does it try to access the network in the first place. R> attempting to access the internet - that's not allowed by HTML Help unless
I suspect the issue with the script error is R> the differences between the two outputs, so I'll see if I can spot the R> not terribly familiar with css, but I'm now setup fairly well to compare I'll work on the wording and propose a change. That and updating the actual version currently in R> suggest using a matching version instead of a recent version would avoid R> Since issues do seem to crop up with version changes, changing the docs to Just ask people to use bash there too, it's not like it's very difficult to Script for MSW instead of this one by now, but OTOH it might be better to R> straight for the Windows directions which run regen.bat which in turn does R> I skipped over the Unix directions which specify regen.sh, and went We need to document that this file must be used more prominently. What should normally be used for generating the documentation. We do have a check for Doxygen version in docs/doxygen/regen.sh which is R> Of course that means changing that file if the build version does get R> indicate that the most recent version of Doxygen might not work correctly. R> documentation file what build version is currently being used, and perhaps R> I'm wondering if it makes sense to at least mention in the adding Its each new version seems to break something new. I do appreciate what Doxygen does, but it's exceedingly painful that Looks like there are even more problems with it than what I had alreadyįound. In any case, this is bad news because I hoped to switch to 1.9.x before Is this another Doxygen bug or are we really doing something wrong here? R> switched to bold text after every table. The xrc_format.h file I modified started off fine, and then While technically it worked, there were definitely R> The contributing guidelines for modifying class documentation don't specify
0 kommentar(er)
